SAM - The ‘Thin Rail’ Malibu

In the 1966 World Titles in San Diego, Australian surfer

Nat Young completely blew everyone away with his aggressive style and dominating performance on a revolutionary new ‘shorter’ board.

The board used was in fact a ‘thin rail’ Malibu, designed by Bob McTavish as a modification from an earlier Joey Cabell (USA) design.

The board was shaped from a foam blank by Nat Young himself while working at Gordon Woods Surfboards, Sydney, and included a ½" single stringer & unusually thin rails for the period.
Although experimentation had already begun with slightly, and performance based, shorter Malibu designs, including the 1964 ‘Hot Dog’ and ‘noserider’ models, these designs were primarily aiming to increase the 'trim' potential of the already established Malibu riding styles and moves, whereas the ‘thin rail’ Malibu was aiming to increase or 'add to' the actual styles and moves being performed.

This design was shorter than the current Malibu boards in use at 9ft 4", with a minimal 22” width and featured a 2 ½ ” thick, 12” long George Greenough stage 2 fin set in a 6’ pod/base.
A fundamental influence on this design was the shift of the board's main area (or volume) to further back on the board. This was essentially what had come out of the
Velzy/Jacob Pig Board 'chance' designs of a decade earlier.
It allowed for more 'drive' from the back of the board, and less focus on the trimming and noseriding control.
This 'drive' was a fundamental change in surfing control.

This particular board was affectionately named ‘Sam’ by Nat Young, and he secretly felt that it had 'magical' powers of it's own.
It had a rounded flat nose and a square tail. The deck was flat and the bottom rounded to allow for 'roll' in turning.
The ‘thin’ rails were shaped to a 50/50 sizing – allowing maximum ‘cutting’ edges. Although harder to paddle, the idea was that the board’s thinner rails would allow the board to cut into the wave when turning. Combined with the 'pig' style volume placement - this would allow sharper turning, or ‘carving’, without the drag of the more traditional thicker Malibu boards. - and also drive out of the turns (bottoms).

Well, the board was a success in all rights and put ‘new moves’ into the minds of surfers around the world.
The actual board used by Nat for this event disappeared during post-contest celebrations, and this style of board was to become one of the last of the Malibu modification designs for the sixties, as the new ’short board’ revolution began soon after.

Pic:-The board shown here is 9’5” Thin Rail Malibu which was made by Keyo Surfboards in Brookvale Sydney around 1966. Sam

research credits:- Special Thanx to Geoff at www.surfresearch.com.au Sam look alike